WHY BHL&B, P.C.?

Buchholz, Harris, Levine & Brennan, P.C. brings to its practice a rare combination of large-firm skills and savvy, and the personal attention and service that is the hallmark of smaller firms.
 

WHAT HAS YOUR SUCCESS WITH HEALTHCARE CLIENTS LED TO?

Since inception, BHL&B, P.C. has expanded our practice areas to include employment litigation, business consultation, casualty, personal injury and business litigation.
 

WHAT DOES BHL&B, P.C. ATTRIBUTE ITS SUCCESS TO?

Aggressive and imaginative legal defense strategies, combined with responsive, personal, cost-effective service to our clients.
 

WHAT SETS BHL&B, P.C. APART FROM ITS COMPETITORS?

Our attorneys are aggressive problem solvers. They focus on what matters most to you and look for ways to find efficient answers and sound solutions.
1
1

Buchholz, Harris, Levine & Brennan, P.C.

The Law Firm of Buchholz, Harris, Levine & Brennan, P.C. is committed to defending the rights of hospitals, physicians, long term care facilities and other health care providers in claims of alleged medical malpractice, hospital negligence, nursing home negligence, or elder or dependent adult abuse.

The firm’s core area of focus has been to serve and defend healthcare providers, over which BHL&B, P.C. has cultivated its reputation as a leader and innovator in the defense of malpractice claims against hospitals or other health care providers, as well as elder or dependent adult abuse cases. Our successful representation of our healthcare clients has naturally led the firm to expand the scope of its practice to also include defense of employment law claims, casualty, personal injury and general business litigation. READ MORE >

BHL&B, P.C. Expertise

Our years of specialized litigation experience creates an unparalleled expertise in defending our healthcare, individual and corporate clients.

BHL&B, P.C. Latest News

Recent Posts / View All Posts

California Law Update – May 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Liability Waiver) Waiver releasing Oakland from liability during charity bike-ride was against public policy to the extent it released the City for negligently violating its statutory duty to maintain public…

California Law Update – April 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Judicial Behavior) Judge’s erroneous and prejudicial evidentiary rulings-coupled with “bizarre,” irrelevant personal musings about society and race-warranted a new trial. Sabrena Odom v. Los Angeles Community College District (No. B327997…

California Law Update – March 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Use of Privileged Communication) Trial court did not abuse its discretion in disqualifying attorney who received a privileged communication from opposing counsel, refused to destroy it, and shared it with…

California Law Update – February 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Statutory Offer to Compromise) Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 limits only prejudgment costs and fees-not costs and fees incurred to enforce a judgment. Caesar Elmi v. Related Management Company,…

California Law Update – December 2024 – January 2025

| Law Updates | No Comments
(Statutory Offer to Compromise) Disagreeing with Gorobets v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, simultaneous 998 offers to the same party may be valid to shift costs. Maritza Zavala v. Hyundai…